The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak keep not exactly a professor, a senior research scientist, apparently the administrator of three of their major projects, and probably notable accordingly. Further references needed--I have not yet checked publications. DGG (
talk) 02:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. I can't find many peer-reviewed publications, his work seems to be published mainly in government monographs, and their citation nos are therefore hard to compare with research papers. There are also several book authorships, but all relatively low-cited. I don't think he meets WP:PROF but he might well meet other guidelines.
Espresso Addict 06:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak delete What has he done? Why should any reader care about this article?
SeptentrionalisPMAnderson 18:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete no evidence of notability per the standard at
WP:PROF.
Eusebeus 17:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete based on article, internet search, and AfD comments from DGG and Espresso Addict.
Kayaker 23:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC).reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.