- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:54, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Noise In Your Eye
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Noise In Your Eye ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Source 2 is not reliable, independent and significant coverage. Sources 3 and 4, PopMatters and Progarchives, don't mention the subject. Besides, PopMatters seems to be borderline for reliability per RSN, so it'd say it's probably not acceptable for notability. [1] Progarchives is unreliable per WP:ALBUMS/SOURCES and RSN. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Chivers and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Pennie. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 15:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 15:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - The nominator has good points about reliable sources or lack thereof, but I will add that this article is historically inaccurate as well. It says that Noise In Your Eye released two albums, The Adventures Of and In the Moment, but those are actually albums by the Michael Giles Mad Band in which these two guys were members of that band, not a duo under a distinct name. The list of personnel in this article, which by the way contains some huge names, are not members of Noise In Your Eye but are instead the various guest stars on those two Michael Giles albums. The two members of the duo, Chivers and Pennie, have already had their own WP articles deleted, and in this one they are being promoted under a distinct group name that has no credits or media coverage of its own, and the article tries to give them credit for someone else's albums on which they merely appeared as individuals. The article was created by someone called Chivchogs, which per WP:DUCK may well be Chivers in self-promotional mode again. This one is particularly desperate and shameless. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 02:49, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable band. They have a cool name though. Popmatters is actually a reliable source. Prog Archives isn't indeed. I also did not find any RS. GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 18:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.