The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Delete Seems like some of her work is notable, but it is not sourced. Given the fact she was unsuccessful in her election, she does not satisfy notability standards.
Pennsylvania2 (
talk) 19:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete – The article's creator, one of its primary editors, sought to promote the candidate even after
user talk page warnings about
conflict of interest issues. —
ADavidB 19:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Wikipedia is not a place for free placement of campaign literature.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Losing candidate that did not receive wide (i.e. national) coverage.
Jmertel23 (
talk) 15:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. People do not get articles just for being candidates in political party primaries — but this makes no credible claim that she has preexisting notability for other reasons independent of her candidacy, and is based entirely on
primary sources that are not support for notability at all.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.