From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Noelle Famera

Noelle Famera (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsuccessful candidate fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. KidAd ( talk) 18:47, 9 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 19:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 19:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 19:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete Seems like some of her work is notable, but it is not sourced. Given the fact she was unsuccessful in her election, she does not satisfy notability standards. Pennsylvania2 ( talk) 19:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Per WP:NPOL. Unsuccessful candidate. Lefcentreright Discuss 19:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete – The article's creator, one of its primary editors, sought to promote the candidate even after user talk page warnings about conflict of interest issues. — ADavidB 19:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a place for free placement of campaign literature. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Losing candidate that did not receive wide (i.e. national) coverage. Jmertel23 ( talk) 15:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Per ADavidB's rationale above. - AppleBsTime ( talk) 02:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. People do not get articles just for being candidates in political party primaries — but this makes no credible claim that she has preexisting notability for other reasons independent of her candidacy, and is based entirely on primary sources that are not support for notability at all. Bearcat ( talk) 18:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky ( talk) 13:40, 15 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.