The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As the nominator is now 'neutral', the consensus is to keep PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 05:56, 27 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Nizamuddin Markaz Masjeed

Nizamuddin Markaz Masjeed (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero references. Not written in encyclopedic style, written more like a myth narrative. Heavy usage of WP:PEACOCK terminology "...a godly person..." "...a man of angelic disposition..." Appears to be copy/paste from any of a number of websites, including [1]. Loses focus of the the article's subject. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:27, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note. The above judgement was based on a huge chunk of cut-and-paste copyvio text, now removed. Staszek Lem ( talk) 20:45, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:09, 4 October 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito☸ Dutta 00:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:09, 4 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr. Z-man 20:16, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply

• Delete or restubbify. All revisions after this one are copyvios. Would delete speedily myself, but a few more days won't make any difference. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• Keep, restubbify (did it; clear copyvio). Reasonable claim of notability. Staszek Lem ( talk) 20:42, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• Neutral My copyvio complaint was taken care of by Staszek Lem. (Thank you!) If the community deems this a notable structure, deserving of an article/stub, I yield. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:36, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• Keep, "It is the global center for the Tablighi network and the origin of the Tablighi Jamaat." is the key phrase here, i.e. being the epicentre for a movement of some 10 million+ followers. Googling "Nizamuddin Markaz" gives more results, seems to be a more common naming. -- Soman ( talk) 09:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:38, 19 October 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.