The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 02:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep. Some coverage already in the article, and more found from a quick Google search:
[1],
[2]. Just about enough there. The EP article should definitely be merged in. --
Michig (
talk) 18:05, 4 April 2009 (UTC)reply
It's borderline, but I'm leaning towards keep. I added a source or two to the article. —LinguistAtLarge •
Talk 05:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton |
Talk 18:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.