The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:23, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Nicolette McKeown

Nicolette McKeown (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CELEBRITY. Must have significant roles in multiple notable films. Kaldari ( talk) 19:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:41, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete as per nominator; my sweeps did not find much but I'll follow this page, and if new sources turn up, I can change my mind.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 22:00, 29 July 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete as per nomination; I guess she isn't considered to be very notable. She has slandered me personally too, but that's not relevant here so I won't say what she did or didn't do. She's not even that famous anyway. PeterMan844 ( talk) 22:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply

PeterMan844, accusing someone of slander can itself be considered slander on this project, and it is, in any event, utterly irrelevant to the discussion of this content. I'm not sure if it's more appropriate at this point to ask you to blank that comment, per our behavioural policies, or to leave it, as removing it might be seen by some to obscure your bias here, but one thing I will ask you to do for certain is to avoid making such accusations about others in the future. Snow ^{let's rap} 23:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete, unless appropriate sourcing can be found; at present the article is completely "sourced" by social media accounts, promotional agency/career page links, and blog entries--all of them WP:PRIMARY and connected to the subject. None of them are in so much as the same galaxy as our WP:reliable source standards when it comes to notability, and most of them source trivial content ('she has a bunny named Dexter and a hamster named Bunny') that would strain being considered as WP:DUE and encyclopedic for any BLP, cosplayers included, even if there was a reliable source. Snow ^{let's rap} 23:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.