From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  20:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC) reply

New Hope Club

New Hope Club (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Purely promotional, most of the work has been done by a (fully disclosed) paid editor. No notability established as per WP:BAND, I believe this clearly does not belong here, and in the two months since the last AfD nothing of notability has occurred. Shritwod ( talk) 08:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. For a group at this early stage of their career, with no hits and barely any releases, the only real avenue for notability is sufficient significant coverage in reliable sources, and it simply isn't there. The best I could find is a short, possibly press-release-based piece in the singer's local newspaper ( [1]). The sources cited in the article are generally not reliable.-- Michig ( talk) 18:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. As I commented in the first AfD last month, the band is signed to Hollywood Records, and their performance this year at Arthur Ashe Kids' Day ( which was broadcast nationally on ABC on August 26) would presumably qualify here: "Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network."-- Bernie44 ( talk) 15:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep this feels like WP:TOOSOON, but I can't make a case to delete it. I'm not convinced that the broadcast that Bernie44 mentions is sufficient for notability, but between that and a 2017 Teen Choice Awards nomination, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt. I expect that in a year they will either be clearly notable, or there will be a follow-up AfD. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:29, 6 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter ( talk) 15:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep perhaps this is the case of creating the article before it should have been. But there's improvement both in the article and their brand image( by that ABC broadcast and news) from the last AfD to now, this may means they are going there. Last AfD was in September, now two months exactly; this AfD I can say is actually hasty, because they cannot get notability overnight in 60 days. If this result in keep, perhaps one more AfD in 2 to 3 years time will finally determine whether they merit inclusion or not, but for now, keep...  —  Ammarpad ( talk) 06:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.