- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) J 947 ( c · m) 05:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Netcompany
- Netcompany ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization. Fails GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 21:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - The company is notable - it is a large company with more than a 1m000 employees and operations in several countries and plenty of references for such a short stub. Ramblersen ( talk) 17:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Passes GNG, but needs expansion and RS in English. South Nashua ( talk) 18:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: I'm glad that I've finally found an article on the AFD list worthy of keeping, this article, although a short stub, seems to be fine, has 7 references, and didn't even have an article issues message to begin with. It's a start an will most likely be improved in the future. Grapefruit17 ( talk) 21:44, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Even the sources present are enough to pass WP:GNG, just the article is stub, but that doesn't meant it should be deleted. – Ammarpad ( talk) 06:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.