- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Neal Blair
- Neal Blair ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources do not provide the indepth coverage asked by GNG. Instead they provide passing, one line mentions that are not enough to meet that requirement. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MRD2014 📞 What I've done 02:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MRD2014 📞 What I've done 02:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This is essentially a prosified version of a résumé, not an encyclopedia article, and the subject is not being shown as the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 21:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.