From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 22:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Navnit Tiwari

Navnit Tiwari (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Politicians are not given an automatic free pass over WP:BIO just because they exist — their ability to qualify for Wikipedia articles is determined by criteria at WP:POLITICIAN or at least they should meet basic GNG. this one fails both! Saqib ( talk) 05:33, 14 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 06:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 06:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nomination, no significnat coverage in reliable sources that are indepndent of the subject and fails WP:NPOL. A Google news search for this politician return with a grand total of two hits and some passing mention in Hindi language news sources. GSS ( talk| c| em) 09:23, 14 April 2018 (UTC) reply
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Delete. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable for the purposes of getting a politician over WP:NPOL, but the sourcing isn't getting him over WP:GNG in lieu — the only properly footnoted references are primary source minutes of his own political party's own internal committee meetings, not reliable source coverage about him in media, and the contextless linkfarm of external links comprises media coverage about other things which happens to glancingly namecheck the subject's existence in the process of failing to be about the subject. Bearcat ( talk) 18:40, 14 April 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.