From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Supreme Education Council (Qatar). Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Navigation Tower

Navigation Tower (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable; there seems to be no significant coverage in WP:GNG sources. Previous AfD resulted in a soft-delete, and the article has now been recreated. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 14:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Qatar. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 14:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, despite it being a distinctive design, it doesn't appear to have attracted much media attention. I can only find a brief description on Worldfinance.com. It looks like it was a commercial venture by a shipping company. Sionk ( talk) 14:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Does not have SIGCOV. DrowssapSMM ( talk) ( contributions) 16:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Supreme Education Council (Qatar), the building's main occupant which has its name upon it. Nate ( chatter) 21:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply
    It might be good to mention the building on the redirect target with an RS; this seems like a good ATD. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 23:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect: This building is not notable. However, the main occupant of this building is Qatar's top education department, and there is an article dedicated to it. HarukaAmaranth 17:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect per above. Not notable enough for a standalone article. The Kip 23:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.