From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for your participation. Please assume good faith with this closure! SarahStierch ( talk) 16:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC) reply

National Asthma Education Certification Board

National Asthma Education Certification Board (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. the coverage isn't really third party, all the coverage I found was from asthma related websites or books, nothing in mainstream news. LibStar ( talk) 13:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 16:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC) reply


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 20:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete – I don't think an organization has to have major news coverage to be considered notable. However, I'm not finding much about this organization other than the NAECB examination itself – and those appear to be guides on how to pass the exam, flash cards, etc, along with a slew of military and government websites that simply list how the certification ties in with their program. Reliable sources, but not enough substantial coverage, in my opinion. — MusikAnimal talk 00:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.