The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for your participation. Please
assume good faith with this closure!
SarahStierch (
talk) 16:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)reply
fails WP:ORG. the coverage isn't really third party, all the coverage I found was from asthma related websites or books, nothing in mainstream news.
LibStar (
talk) 13:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 16:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mz7 (
talk) 20:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete – I don't think an organization has to have major news coverage to be considered notable. However, I'm not finding much about this organization other than the NAECB examination itself – and those appear to be guides on how to pass the exam, flash cards, etc, along with a slew of military and government websites that simply list how the certification ties in with their program. Reliable sources, but not enough substantial coverage, in my opinion. —
MusikAnimaltalk 00:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.