The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 23:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have
no quorum, it is NOT eligible for
soft deletion because it has been
previously PROD'd (via summary). --
Cewbot (
talk) 00:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
TheSandDoctorTalk 23:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. None of his political activity passes
WP:NPOL — people do not automatically get Wikipedia articles just for being unsuccessful candidates in political party primaries or municipal council elections, or for being a backroom campaign consultant to other unsuccessful candidates, or for being local chair of a political party's local chapter in a county — but the stuff about his work as a writer is referenced to
primary sources and a Q&A interview in which he's the speaker and not the subject being spoken about, which is not how you get a writer over
WP:AUTHOR either.
Bearcat (
talk) 16:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per Bearcat, who always makes these fails NPOL/GNG deletion rationales more eloquently than I.
SportingFlyerT·C 20:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.