The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unfortunately it appears there is almost no secondary source coverage of the subject, thus failing GNG and NPERSON. As there are instances of writing by the subject, it may be a case of TOOSOON but does not currently meet the notability threshold.
Innisfree987 (
talk) 07:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom + it just sounds like someone's resumé.
LeBron4 (
talk) 15:21, 28 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Northern Escapee (
talk) 18:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete the sourcing does not rise to the level of passing GNG.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 21:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.