- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Matt14451 ( talk) 21:01, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Nabeel Gareeb
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nabeel Gareeb ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Need re-evaluation, no in-depth coverage about him. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Pollock's ( talk) 14:59, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. This looks like a reliable reference from FOrbes magazine itself rather than from a Forbes "contributor". This is also from Forbes, the magazine. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 16:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:02, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Meets criteria. So said The Great Wiki Lord. ( talk) 03:08, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep needs a rewrite but seems to (barely) pass GNG Chetsford ( talk) 23:01, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.