The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If the list is created then anyone can create redirects at that point.
Davewild (
talk) 07:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Does not meet
WP:GNG: a completely ordinary multistory condo in Singapore with very routine real estate listings, was cited once in Straits Times (reprinted elsewhere) as an example of local market rents, won an obscure local award. Article has no reason to exist other than promotion.
I am also nominating the following related pages because they were created at the same time by the same self-declared COI editor (who probably "forgot" to declare COI here "probably in a hurry"), and have exactly the same sourcing problems:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Davewild (
talk) 08:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Move to List of landmark sites in Singapore as I'm not finding much with my searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) aside from
one at Books. In a way, it's likely this wasn't a major event that would've attracted news attention unless it was provoked.
SwisterTwistertalk 17:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: There is no such article and just these two entities aren't enouh to start a list article. —
Brianhe (
talk) 14:46, 9 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:29, 9 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.