- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 10:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Musecam
- Musecam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article should be deteted because it is a non-notable piece of mobile software. This is because it fails WP:GNG because there are no independent reliable sources for this subject. KAP03 ( talk) 04:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Not notable company. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 09:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete qualifies for A7 in my opinion, but we are at the end of the AfD, so no point in !voting speedy delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.