The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 14:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Murcyleen Peerzada

Murcyleen Peerzada (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From Bollywood to Islam, and then back to previous "way of life", this subject fails any notability criteria. Hardly any sources speaks of her "independently". I do not see anything that would help the subject pass ANYBIO. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 08:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 08:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 08:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete Spam, promotional and simply a vanity article. RationalPuff ( talk) 16:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete an overly promotional article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Article lacks SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth from IS RS. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements.  //  Timothy ::  t |  c |  a   06:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.