From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 11:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Muhammad Asad Chaudhry (Journalist)

Muhammad Asad Chaudhry (Journalist) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Journalists are not given an automatic free pass over WP:BIO just because they exist — their ability to qualify for Wikipedia articles is determined by criteria at WP:JOURNALIST. The article claim he authored a book but I found it non-notable (at least by WP standard). Search produce stories the subject has done for Pakistani newspaper Daily Times but doesn't produce any coverage in independent RS about himself so fails to meet basic GNG. Saqib ( talk) 05:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 21:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I can only find article by him, none about him. Nor can i find any coverage of his book. FloridaArmy ( talk) 00:58, 29 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The article doesn’t even present a prima facie case for notability. Husounde ( talk) 00:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.