The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete No discernible claim to notability in the article, sources fail
WP:RS and a Google turned up nothing at all. That's three strikes. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 20:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment -- I see little notable in this stub. Being among the oldest churches in the area might make it notable, as might its architecture. I am willing to be convinved that it is notable, but this is certainly not yet shown.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 14:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.