The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. And temporary salt until reliable sources start raining down and wash it off
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 20:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Subject does not meet the criteria for notability. Searches turn up blogs, Spotify, youtube videos, all of which should not be used as sources. Citation to the Swahillia version of the BBC
[1] is the main page of the website. Subject does not meet
WP:GNG or
WP:CREATIVE. Also note that this article has been deleted for similar reasons before (
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Puaz).
SamHolt6 (
talk) 17:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete and salt. No additional sources over deletion discussion two months ago. czar 18:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete and salt per nom and Czar -
GretLomborg (
talk) 18:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Still fails
WP:GNG. A temporary salt may be a good idea, too. Anarchyte (
work |
talk) 03:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - No substantial cover in reliable sources so fails
WP:GNG.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 12:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Probably could have been a
WP:G4, as this version is not substantially improved content or source-wise, and its only been just over a month. Also support salting and/or warning the article creator that continuing to do this is considered
disruptive and could lead to blocks, as he's created it both times, and participated in the last AFD, so he knows there were problems with it.
Sergecross73msg me 18:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Nominated the first AfD for this article and frankly this "new" iteration has not fixed any of the problems present in the original. Also, I'm not sure if I missed it from the original or it's new information, but the article states that the subject's son is named "Randy Joel", so it looks like a
WP:COI case to me.
SorryNotSorry ✽
✉ 19:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.