The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Mz7 (
talk) 01:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Author are not given an automatic free pass over WP:BIO just because they exist — their ability to qualify for Wikipedia articles is determined by criteria at WP:AUTHOR. this is author of only one book which is not notable (at least by WP standards) Search doesn't produce any substantial information about the person and his book so Can't see any significance here. Basically fails GNG as well.
Saqib (
talk) 05:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per above. Also cross-wiki spam by various sockpuppets.
hiàn 23:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:NAUTHOR, specifically the need to have a significant, oft cited impact on their field of literature.--
SamHolt6 (
talk) 04:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC)reply
comment The article has been edited and adapted to suit the encyclopedia, please read it and show your opinion.--
انتريا (
talk) 13:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable.
DrKay (
talk) 16:59, 20 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - self-promotion created by sockpuppet. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 15:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.