The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 14:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:GNG. No independent notability shown in reliable secondary sources. Secondary sources provided are either unreliable or passing mentions.
spryde |
talk 13:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, basically. Just no notability. This is not unlike what we see in articles on university departments--they are rarely notable in their own right, and that their existence relies on being part of a notable organization doesn't make them notable. I doubt that really any councils are notable--looking at the category and clicking randomly on one,
San Diego-Imperial Council, that one is not notable.
Drmies (
talk) 21:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete no notability. It's weird how some sections of the project just accumulate cruft.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 16:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Topic is not notable, as councils, even with so many references (many of which are primary), are not notable to begin with. Also, there isn't much coverage on the topic. HarukaAmaranth 09:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.