From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.   Salvidrim! ·  06:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Most Wanted (eSports)

Most Wanted (eSports) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is nothing more than a promotional puff-piece for a non-notable group authored by Willhire with substantial contributions by Jdaiey who are both self-outed as COI at Most Wanted (eSports)#Senior management in the roles of Chief Human Resources Officer and Chief Operating Officer respectively.

In Willhire's own words, "I have made zero valid contributions. Honestly don't know why this account still exists." Cabayi ( talk) 08:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 09:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:11, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Not notable. ZettaComposer ( talk) 17:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep seems to be some coverage in Dexerto and Dot Esports.-- Prisencolin ( talk) 19:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep It is notable from reliable sources and needs to be updated, but the article was created with COI violations. Unfortunately, I can see why it will fit the deletion guidelines as well as it needs to be authored in good faith other than with a conflict of interest. -- User:Willhire ( talk) 1:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 06:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.