The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn without any non-keep !votes.
The BushrangerOne ping only 12:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Subject doesn't meet
WP:GNG. Even the corresponding article in Hebrew relies on a single source. Chris Troutman (
talk) 23:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. As a brigade commander, especially of such a famous formation, he probably meets
WP:SOLDIER. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 19:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Meets
WP:SOLDIER, since he commanded a famous formation in a significant event. Hebrew footnotes go to one source, but the article lists and uses more.
Hawkeye7 (
talk) 19:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep – Mann was involved in creating multiple important units that formed the IDF. His career spans a lot more than just what is currently in the article. The Hebrew Wikipedia lists a few sources, but just one inline source. I will add as much information as I can to the article, although acquiring some of the necessary sources might take some time. —
Ynhockey(
Talk) 10:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Note – I have expanded the article as much as I could with the sources currently available to me. —
Ynhockey(
Talk) 12:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)reply
I withdraw my nomination Subject now has evidence of
WP:GNG. Anyone is welcome to speedy close the discussion. Chris Troutman (
talk) 12:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.