The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 22:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Moritz Resl

Moritz Resl (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NARTIST and GNG fail. There are a few slim articles but most sourcing is primary. A search found little else. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 14:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 14:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

• I don't think it's canvassing to ask the editor who accepted the article at AfC, Olaf Kosinsky what their thoughts are, since AfC is primarily concerned with whether the article would survive an AfD nomination. Vexations ( talk) 19:25, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

• Weak delete. [1] (profile in an exhibition catalogue) is halfway decent, but I couldn't find anything else. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 17:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Does not meet guidelines. It is important that we follow strict sourcing and conservatively follow guidelines regarding BLPs.   //  Timothy ::  talk  07:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.