The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
JForget 00:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)reply
probable hoax, otherwise no assertion of notability. See
Talk:Monticlair Nutly for detailed reasoning. Prod contested by author. -
kotra (
talk) 02:30, 31 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete I agree, I do not like hoaxes.
JJ98 (
talk) 15:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete Kudos to the article's author for such an elaborate hoax. —
Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk 19:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.