From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 14:56, 5 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Mojo Photo Booth

Mojo Photo Booth (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability. References are its own BBB page and a business opportunity ad. No mention on Google news. RogerThatTypo ( talk) 19:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 00:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 00:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nomination: Claim to be "featured in Entrepreneur Magazine as the Best Booth on the Market" is just their own ad on Entrepreneur Magazine's website — so basically WP:SPAM from someone who knows that's the best claim to fame they had. Attempt at Google search is overwhelmingly franchisees/licensees or something all over the country flogging it for their own region, plus a very negative (and detailed) review from someone who apparently had one of these things. Also seems to have some kind of personal connection to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knox equity group. -- Closeapple ( talk) 03:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC) reply

This is nothing more than an advertisement for their business. Please delete... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Party Booths ( talkcontribs) 02:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ( Talk) 07:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.