The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per
WP:CSD#G5. Creator was a crosswiki sockmaster.
Mz7 (
talk) 19:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The subject of this article fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NACTOR. The article is filled with primary sources. A Google search of him doesn't show him being discussed in reliable sources.
Umakant Bhalerao (
talk) 10:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm not seeing where Cbl62 has opined on this article. – Thjarkur(talk) 13:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, lacks coverage in reliable independant sources. – Thjarkur(talk) 13:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Decent amount of coverage about the subject herself including.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.Amir.we1(talk) 15:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
they are primary sources and not independent of him. I don't think any of the article's sources comes close to the significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject that we need to establish
Moghaddam Mehdi's notability.
Umakant Bhalerao (
talk) 18:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete the sourcing for this article falls well short of what is needed to pass
WP:GNG and doesn't pass
WP:NACTOR. Best,
GPL93 (
talk) 18:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
delete in violation of TOU by an xwiki spammer/hoaxer.
Praxidicae (
talk) 19:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.