- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 06:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Modern studies on the brain
- Modern studies on the brain ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Going to boldly propose this strange list for deletion. None of the entries have reliable sources to support them meeting our notability criteria. The list has no inclusion criteria. We are WP:NOTTEXTBOOK and not a collection of lecture notes, nor an index. What do other editors think about this odd list? Tom (LT) ( talk) 10:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTESSAY.
- The only non-Wikipedia-mirror hit for "modern studies on the brain" (consecutive words) is this Amazon page; the matching text seems to be a chapter header of the book. Weirdly enough the book cover and the article have a very similar picture, so there might be promotion or copvio issues. Tigraan Click here to contact me 14:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.