The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 14:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Model United Nations of Lübeck

Model United Nations of Lübeck (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 15:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC) reply

• "No coverage" is wrong, there are several articles on the Google News archive. I am not certain whether there is enough for GNG. In any case, a redirect (with perhaps a bit of a merge) to List of Model United Nations conferences is better than deleting this. — Kusma ( t· c) 10:37, 22 November 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete as per nom. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 19:45, 22 November 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep "No coverage" is wrong. References (e.g to ^[1]) should be added though for it to comply with GNG. Sebastian tilman ( talk) 12:25, 25 November 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete The one reference above is not enough to show an event is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.