The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
List of telecom companies in India. Ugh, it looks like somebody moved this in the middle of the AfD. Folks, please don't do that. It just makes it that much more confusing to sort out when closing these discussion. In any case, the gist of this discussion is that there should be one list instead of the myriad ones we've got now. So, I'm going to redirect all of these:
Because they are all the same subject and mostly the same content, it would make more sense to focus efforts into one or two lists.
Ilyina Olya Yakovna (
talk) 15:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC) —
WP:SOCKSTRIKEreply
Struck my !vote upon further consideration. North America1000 11:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as Duplicate The content that is supposed to be covered here is already covered under
Mobile network operators of India which is a much comprehensive article. This just duplicates that info.
Hagennos (
talk) 06:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)reply
I have merged both the articles and since the other article is new, have proposed speedy on that. If speedy is done on that then I suggest this AfD to be closed as Keep.
Hagennos (
talk) 15:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Exact duplicate of
Mobile network operators of India with just a different title. The other article has a much more apt title and is significantly older.
Gotitbro (
talk) 14:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep This should be similar to
Mobile phone industry in China and similar articles for other countries, but the section with manufacturers was blanked, possibly unintentionally. The other article can then be merged to this one.
Peter James (
talk) 15:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
T. Canens (
talk) 00:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Redirect as suggested seems a sensible way of handling this. DGG (
talk ) 09:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.