The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Miss Supranational (World Beauty Association)

Miss Supranational (World Beauty Association) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of the previously deleted multiple times. Notability remains hughly dubious. Staszek Lem ( talk)

• 11:13, 3 September 2014 Anachronist (talk | contribs) deleted page Miss Supranational (G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational (2nd nomination))
• 09:38, 31 August 2014 RoySmith (talk | contribs) deleted page Miss Supranational (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational (2nd nomination))
• 12:42, 18 December 2010 Dabomb87 (talk | contribs) deleted page Miss Supranational (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement (CSDH))
• 13:08, 7 December 2010 Courcelles (talk | contribs) deleted page Miss Supranational (Mass removal of pages added by Dhimasbayu; A7 and G11)
• 17:29, 7 September 2010 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted page Miss Supranational (Expired PROD, concern was: This is not a notable beauty pageant. There are only 2 titleholders and barely any sources (none of which are from reliable third parties). Don't think this is notable enough to be listed on Wikipedia,)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA  (talk) 20:13, 7 April 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete & salt due to persistent recreation & promotionalism. K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC) reply
• Speedy Delete, salt, and sanction the editor who created it. Exemplo347 ( talk) 21:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Per WP:AGF we cannot assume this is the same author who pushes it all these years. But from the love the page was written with I smell WP:COI (may be mistaken, since this is not exactly and SPA). Staszek Lem ( talk) 23:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete again. I can't see the deleted Miss Supranational content to determine if this is a G4 recreation, but the notability issues are identical with those from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational (2nd nomination). This pageant lacks significant coverage by independent reliable sources. We have the usual pageant blogs and forum posts along with incidental mentions by more reliable publications. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 8 April 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete no significant coverage in secondary reliable sources. SamsaK ( talk) 20:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:36, 13 April 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.