The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Reason North8000 (
talk) 22:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Reviewed as new article patrol. This is about a classification term for irrigation projects in India. Only one secondary source given and IMO insufficient to establish wp:notability for this as a separate topic. This article consists of two sentences which I added to the
Irrigation in India article so no material or references would be lost.
Dealing solely with the merits of whether this article meets
WP:NOTABILITY (which is the only cause for proposed deletion claimed by the proposer), it appears that the article should be presumed to be notable because it appears to meet
WP:GNG in that there is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". I will note here that as per
WP:ARTN, notability is measured with respect to the subject, not the article. It appears the subject meets
WP:GNG because of the following coverage which is either extensive in the body content or is about the subject matter:
Redirect to
Irrigation in India as it does not currently contain any information not on that page. No prejudice to recreation if expansion is done at the same time. buidhe 19:15, 13 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Irrigation in India, and I already copied the material to that page.North8000 (
talk) 21:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.