The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ~ Amory(
u •
t •
c) 00:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)reply
That's "a well-known and significant award or honor"? They have a number of awards in a number of categories and I wouldn't expect that to make the winners automatically notable.
Reywas92Talk 00:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment She also published several books during the 1990s: Festive Decorations, The Step by Step Art of Dried Flowers, and Celebration Flowers, so she's had a long career, and she may well meet
WP:CREATIVE. I will see if I can find reviews, profiles, etc.
RebeccaGreen (
talk) 10:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep I agree with Andrew Davidson's reasoning. That is a notable award in her field, and only the best in that field would be making such large displays for the Queen of England.
DreamFocus 15:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep Agree with Andrew
9H48F (
talk) 13:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep I agree that a gold medal at the Chelsea Flower Show meets
WP:ANYBIO. (And yes, for anyone interested in flowers and gardens, they are well-known awards, and well reported in the media.) The article has improved referencing since it was nominated for AfD.
RebeccaGreen (
talk) 10:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.