The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was WP:SNOW delete. There is no reasonable prospect of this being kept.
BD2412T 00:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Poorly translated and poorly sourced. Also: Moulatsiotis in one of his interviews in 1995 said that "In the future, a mark will be most likely made, it will be a chip, a biometric ID or a scanner in the forehead". [5] Judging from what Moulatsiotis said his predictions were probably right.. Really? Guy (
help! -
typo?) 07:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)reply
weak KeepWhilst its badly written its a "rel" theory that has been around since god knows when.
Slatersteven (
talk) 09:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete – The section
Number of the beast#The mark of the beast and microchips contains a better summary of the subject. While the subject is noteworthy, there is nothing worth keeping or merging in this article, and the title is not worth keeping as a redirect to that section. – Thjarkur(talk) 09:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete What monks proclaim when they are preaching is a matter of faith, not fact. The
Three Secrets of Fátima are a matter of faith, not fact. That other monks have got hold of this and propagated this is a matter of opinion, rumour and gossip from the aforesaid so-called sources. This article does not have
WP:NPOV and proceeds to make claims upon claims. Article is pedalling a point of view based on nonsense. --
Whiteguru (
talk) 11:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete -
Number of the Beast covers this subject referenced reasonably well. Probably no reason to keep a redirect for the clumsiness of the title. --intelatitalk 14:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Piling on, there's nothing worth merging or saving in this POV fork, even if notability were established it would be TNT-worthy.
GirthSummit (blether) 13:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Agree with above comments. ---
FULBERT (
talk) 13:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.