Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Michael_Steinger References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Michael Steinger

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a non-notable lawyer who unsuccessfully represented a client in an action against a celebrity, and failed to win a nomination to the Senate. I don't believe he meets WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:27, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete. The rule of law is important and he does appear to be politically/civically engaged, but given the overabundance of lawyers now, he really has to separate himself from the pack. He fails to do this. I don't see adequate in-depth coverage from reliable sources. Knox490 ( talk) 03:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Delete defeated candidates for state legislature are not notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Delete Where I live I see his commercials (and just recently I hired a lawyer like Steinger to represent me after I was struck by a car while out for my morning walk) for his law firm all the time. That said, not notable lawyer and failed politician. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Comment An article on this person was previously deleted after an AFD. The discussion can be found here. I nominated this article for speedy deletion and suggest both articles be SALTED if this edition is deleted again. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:22, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.