The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Procedural nomination. This article has been repeatedly speedy-deleted for various reasons (earlier a7 and g11, and latest g5). It has been created/recreated by socks. This newest recreation is also by a sock, but a new sock (different farm), so the article is not eligible for g5. This version of the article is very similar to the one last created and deleted per g5.
Bbb23 (
talk) 18:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - Promotional article no in-depth coverage of the subject in question. There is no inherent notability in being a Rockefeller.
FitIndia✉ बात 18:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete and
Creation protect I think it's clear that the sockpuppets will keep coming and recreating this article. -
ZLEAT\C 00:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete and salt per nom. A vanity article about a clearly non-notable individual, created by a paid-editing outfit. - Tom |
Thomas.W talk 14:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. He's done nothing but "was influenced by his grandfather" and "
follows closely" a well-known teen activist. He's
riding on the coat-tails of his ancestors and a 15-year-old girl.
Bearian (
talk) 16:51, 3 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.