The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 03:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Reviewed during NPP. Could not find anything near a GNG coverage. Previously deleted and then again proded. Some concern that the creator has 144 lifetime edits and starting with edit #1 was an expert at creating articles for living people who could benefit from having an article.
Has some recognition, with the top one their being listed in Forbes top 30 under 30 but IMO that is not enough to override GNG type coverage requirement.
North8000 (
talk) 23:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - very likely
WP:UPE spam. I've blocked the author.
MER-C 19:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per above -
WP:UPE applies and written in a promotional tone.
HarukaAmaranth春香 22:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.