- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. So Why 09:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Mettl
- Mettl ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no evidence of notability.The refs are mostly the usual Press-release based newspaper sources, and a variety of mostly promotional notices. The NYT article is a small part of a general article about technology in India. Written by a new account--the similarity to other such articles is so great that I think odds are rather high that it's a paid editor. DGG ( talk ) 19:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- run-of-the-mill professional services company. Copy includes routine product / corporate news and general puffery, as in:
- In 2014, the company began offering online certification for IT programs.[14] That same year the company opened an office in California and named Subhash Tantry president of US operations!
- There's nothing else there. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- I am the content strategist at Mettl and while there is a conflict of interest, I would love to have a chance to review and edit the article as per the Wikipedia guidelines if possible. As for the puffery, Mettl has won a number of significant awards including IE50 Awards, 2017 which was not mentioned for the same reason. Any guidelines on how to approach this better would be significantly more helpful. Nayakdebarshi ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC) — Nayakdebarshi ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete, not notable, fails WP:Corp. Kierzek ( talk) 18:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.