From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After a month on AfD and two relists, another relist seems pointless. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Metabologen

Metabologen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a neologism. Do not believe this is commonly-used terminology; 45 results in google scholar verifies this. LT910001 ( talk) 09:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Redirect to Bone morphogenetic protein. A Gscholar search shows this to be a real term, although restricted to a narrow field and not widely used. Some sources say that it is a synonym for cytokine, but again, not widely used. Since the term is mostly associated with BMPs and is mentioned in the lead of Bone morphogenetic protein, this seems a natural target for a redirect. -- Mark viking ( talk) 14:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC ( talk) 09:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC) reply


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 07:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Keep Harmless article for an obscure word for which there are actually a few sources to cite. Narayanese ( talk) 08:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.