The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
At first glance, the actor appears to be well-known with numerous roles in television serials, films, and what not. However, upon closer inspection, it becomes evident that the subject only had minor roles in the majority of those television serials and films, thus failing to meet NACTOR. Anyone wishing to argue based on GNG must provide THREE, i repeat, THREE of the best coverages in RS -only. ROTM coverage like
this,
this and even
INTERVIEWS like this is not enough to meet GNG. —
Saqib (
talk I
contribs) 20:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: She is notable. In this source her education and how she started is all mentioned
[1] and her married life source in this
[2].(
BeauSuzanne (
talk) 07:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC))reply
BeauSuzanne, Your comments sound WP:ATA. These coverages can be used for WP:V, but they're not enough to establish WP:GNG. —
Saqib (
talk I
contribs) 09:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I am not talking about WP:V. I am saying that it meets WP:NACTOR. It has mentioned her drama roles and her recent role of Shehna.(
BeauSuzanne (
talk) 19:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC))reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguilltalk 13:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak keep because the interviews in rather reliable sources have a presentation that might show her roles are signficant. If not why not DRAFTITY until better sources are found, so as to avoid the risk of constant recreations/deletion and mutual frustration?-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Mushy Yank, Roznama92News isn't even a RS. It's just one of the countless Urdu language newspapers circulated in Pakistan. And I wouldn't outright label
the interview in The News as a paid placement since I lack evidence, but considering the nature of the questions posed by the interviewer, it's a plausible possibility. Anyhow, I'm fine with DRAFITIFICATION, though. —
Saqib (
talk I
contribs) 14:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 04:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: Clean up shouldn't be deletion. Appearing in multiple notable films meets
WP:NACTOR though requires whether it is significant or not (though should be); it is a known role in the films. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 09:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
SafariScribe, Fwiw - In Pakistani TV dramas, supporting roles do not have the same level of significance as in Western or even Indian TV series. —
Saqib (
talk I
contribs) 09:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Then a policy should be initiated in
Wikipedia:Village pump. Fwiw also, supporting roles can be notable when it has been done for multiple times. Why then do you see a supporting actor or actress awards? Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 09:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
SafariScribe, But the fact is she hasn't even really had any supporting roles in the series she's been in so far. No one's provided any evidence for it, not even for dramas like GT Road, Guddu, Farq, Nikah, Kalank, Umm-e-Haniya, and Jaisay Aapki Marzi, which she's known for. So, it seems she's just part of the
ensemble cast. —
Saqib (
talk I
contribs) 10:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak delete I am not convinced that the GNG or NACTOR have been met. Keep counterarguments have been unconvincing, so I am inclined to side with the nom.
Toadspike[Talk] 10:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.