The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Melonport

Melonport (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Copy PROD: "Fails WP:NCORP due to a lack of indepth coverage of the company itself, as the articles cited focus on broad concepts. Also a likely UDP per WP:COIN Noticeboard." Widefox; talk 00:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Comment again if by UDP you mean an undisclosed person (I.e. a potential undisclosed conflict of interest) I repeat until I am blue in the face that just because i'm interested in the crypto space does not make me linked to every subject I have ever edited on! By all means AFD, but I am tired of these continual COI accusations which are totally unfounded. The founder of this project, Melonport, was on UK TV about a week ago, she is trying to build a "Bloomberg for crypto". About a million people or more would have watched her interview. Oh I give up trying to explain. Gonna take a wiki break for a few weeks. Always happy to cooperate where I can. Uhooep ( talk) 01:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Yes Uhooep I saw her on TV. Widefox; talk 10:33, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Uhooep But just because there's a non-independent item on the news, doesn't mean we it's notable, per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:TOOSOON. Widefox; talk 13:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Comment - I filed the original PROD, which was declined. For the record, my mentioning of COIN was in reference to Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Polkadot_(project).-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 01:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

That's now at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_125#Polkadot (project), which for the record I created, so there's some circularity, purely coincidental with two editors acting independently. The wording of the PROD is verbatim. Widefox; talk 01:30, 7 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Baby miss fortune} 01:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ^{Baby miss fortune} 01:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. ^{Baby miss fortune} 01:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete -- does not meet WP:NCORP; clearly WP:TOOSOON for a company launched in 2016. Sourcing fails WP:CORPDEPTH, being passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete One third of the article's sources are concerned with broad subjects like the cryptocurrency and the existence of a "Crypto Valley" in Switzerland. None of this imparts information about or real notability on the actual subject of the article (Melonport), which indicates to me a WP:CORPDEPTH failure and a lack of encyclopedic notability.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 01:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete I agree, this is WP:TOOSOON, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fail GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ⁺⁺ 22:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.