The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Promotional CV style piece about a person not yet shown to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies of living people. All of the sources appear to be from publications close to the subject, none of which are listed on
WP:RSP there is no indication of
WP:ANYBIO the only accolade they have is a mention in a listicle for variety magazine. The entire page is essentially built on marcomms puffery. Therefore, this article is nothing more than puffery.
Ferkingstad (
talk) 13:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:BASIC; the article is written in a neutral tone and multiple independent sources are listed as reliable at
WP:RSP (i.e.
WP:VARIETY, CNET, VentureBeat) and
WP:VG/RS; more from Variety based on her recognition as a 2018 Variety 500 Honoree is
here.
Beccaynr (
talk) 15:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep. Appears to pass
WP:GNG per independent and in-depth sources already in the article. One of nine likely bad-faith nominations in reaction to the deletion of the nominator's article at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIDA Select. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 18:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep on a procedural basis as the nomination rationale has no merits. Refer to the nominator's talk page exchange with
User:StarryGrandma, they are
disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. Suggest an administrator
snow keep this nomination and perhaps sanction or warn the nominator for their disruptive behaviour.
Haleth (
talk) 09:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.