The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There appears to be no
WP:SIGCOV. Of the 10 sources:
1 is the original book with the phrase (
WP:PRIMARY)
2 link to a non-reliable site designed to promote the phrase
1 just mentions the phrase
the rest are somewhat OK-ish sources that do not actually even mention the phrase (I have simply searched them, so a mention or two could have escaped my attention)
Викидим (
talk)
00:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect/merge anything reliably sourced that turns up to the main Hunger Games article. While the phrase itself doesn't appear to meet the
WP:GNG, it's common enough that somebody might search for it here.
GreenLipstickLesbian (
talk)
03:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Once we zoom out and look at The Hunger Games, and not just at the phrase, there is indeed a large cultural impact. It is therefore documented in a score of research articles (see
doi:
10.3138/jrpc.25.3.372 and
[1] as very different examples showing the breadth of material available from the researchers), so journalism from daily newspapers is not needed as a source at all.
Викидим (
talk)
06:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge to
The Hunger Games. I agree with the above discussion that there is not enough coverage to support a separate article, but a selective merge would preserve the coverage that does exist and this is a viable search term so it would be helpful to lead readers somewhere for it.
Aoba47 (
talk)
21:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.