The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable athlete who participated in one Olympics and got no medals. Wgullyn (
talk) 14:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete There is nothing to indicate this person was notable. Being on a team at the Olympics that does not win a medal is not enough to show that someone is notable.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 14:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:GNG. My searches did not turn up any SIGCOV. The best I found is
this which simply confirms that he was on the Swiss field hockey team that finished seventh out of nine teams competing at the 1928 Olympics. If researchers later dig up SIGCOV, this could be recreated without the loss of substance (the narrative text here is less than 15 words).
Cbl62 (
talk) 15:29, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
NOTE: This article was part of a batch creation of 11 identical, cookie-cutter, one-line sub-stubs on members of the same 1928 Swiss field hockey team that finished seventh of nine teams. All were created within a 13-minute span as follows:
The purported claim to notability is their participation on the
1928 Switzerland men's national field hockey team, and there isn't even an article on that team. All 11 of these sub-stubs should probably be deleted IMO.
Cbl62 (
talk) 15:29, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment I agree with
User:Cbl62 - none of these articles have any notability and it looks like they were all copy/pasted with only the names changed. Wgullyn (
talk) 20:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all 11. Just clarifying that my original delete vote applies to all 11 of the cookie-cutter articles listed above.
Cbl62 (
talk) 20:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all. No evidence of notability demonstrated for any of them. Also, three articles created in the same minute, and 11 in 13 minutes, suggests the creator didn't even check for notability before creating - which unfortunately means we are likely to waste more time debating their deletion than they did creating them.
BilledMammal (
talk) 21:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
That's a rather false claim, as they all met the notability requirements when they were created. Unfortunately, those were changed about two years AFTER the pages were created. LugnutsFire Walk with Me 15:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Redirect Per Lugnuts as a valid redirection target. I would suggest in the future to simply be bold and redirect the page in clear situations like this rather than start an AfD.
Smartyllama (
talk) 18:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.