- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 14:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Maveryx
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Maveryx ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company, WP:PROMO reads like a sales brochure. Its only cited sources are two long-ago conference talks by employees. Search reveals little other coverage. HouseOfChange ( talk) 15:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. HouseOfChange ( talk) 15:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. HouseOfChange ( talk) 15:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete, I was able to find a handful of search matches on Google Scholar, but searching through the non-paywalled ones did not reveal any significant coverage, which leaves me less than optimistic about the papers that I was not able to review. signed,
Rosguill
talk 15:56, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ Rosguill: I also found mentions, when doing a BEFORE, but nothing that came close to GNG "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The articles in it-wiki (this is an Italian company) and in de-wiki were both created in 2020 by SPAs, both are translations of this promotional article. HouseOfChange ( talk) 17:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per my last AfD. No reliable sources can be found to support the product's notability. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
@ Walter Görlitz: I don't understand why we are discussing the Maveryx ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) article instead of the Maveryx Srl ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) one. Rosguill reviewed it because I moved it from my sandbox after I waited many months for a review. -- Megaride ( talk) 20:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Because this is the article up for deletion. Neither meets notability requirements. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 20:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Megaride, I converted Maveryx Srl to a redirect because it appeared to fall far short of meeting WP:NCORP, and Maveryx was a relevant related article to point it to that had a bit of a stronger claim to meeting WP:GNG. It appears that it as well, however, falls short of that mark. Additionally, you have not yet responded to the COI disclosure notice that I left on your talk page. signed, Rosguill talk 20:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
@ Rosguill:, I just responded the COI disclosure notice on my talk page.-- Megaride ( talk) 21:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC) Walter Görlitz, the Maveryx ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) article was created when it was an open-source project. After that it is was just updated. I used other articles as example to write it.-- Megaride ( talk) 22:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Spam cross wiki. No reliable sources to support either the product and the company notability. -- НУРшЯGIO( beware of the moose) 06:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.