From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In terms of policy-backed !votes, there's a clear consensus for deletion Nosebagbear ( talk) 10:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Mauro Alfonso

Mauro Alfonso (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Businessman doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO- coverage is largely WP:PASSING mentions or of routine events. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:57, 21 April 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Italy. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Non-notable business person. Passing mention in sources/press releases. Oaktree b ( talk) 18:57, 21 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep in the last 20 years he covered primary roles in different companies. -- Genera123 ( talk) 08:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply
    As the author of this article, could you please clarify which sources you believe shows that WP:NBIO is met? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. While it's true that Alfonso has held several positions at various companies, that doesn't show that he's notable for Wikipedia purposes. My search didn't find much more than quotes and passing mentions in the press, which aren't enough to satisfy the GNG's requirement of significant coverage. The Financial Times article ( ProQuest  1503352513) is a decent source, but it's mostly just an interview and isn't enough to demonstrate notability on its own. Since no logical ATDs come to mind, deletion is appropriate. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.