The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of
WP:SIGCOV. Fails
WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Promotional article, created by a
WP:SPA.
Edwardx (
talk) 19:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Strong Delete First three refs are on affiliate sites. First one is Forbes sites domain which is anybody can write for and do 2,3,4 are of a similar type. 10th is the collections subdomain of the la times, which anybody can write for. All these are not
WP:RS. The other refs are name ref, and reinforce the advertising aspect of the article. Changing to strong delete.
scope_creep (
talk) 01:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
T. Canens (
talk) 00:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.