The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per
WP:SPEEDYKEEP#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 15:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Question to nominator. There appear to be fairly large citations to books and papers. Does the nom think these do not contribute to notability?
Xxanthippe (
talk) 21:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC).reply
The Google Scholar profile that was linked seems to be worse than useless: it includes some irrelevant publications and none of the significant ones. I removed it. Instead, to find the high-citation works, one should search author:matthias-finger —
David Eppstein (
talk) 00:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks: when this new search is done
[1] does the nominator think that it has any bearing on notability?
Xxanthippe (
talk) 00:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC).reply
Keep - he is a prominent and prolific researcher whose publications are impactful enough to meet
WP:PROF, as I read it.
Llajwa (
talk) 21:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. In case it is not obvious I support Keep on the basis of a pass of
WP:Prof#C1 at least.
Xxanthippe (
talk) 23:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC).reply
Withdraw nomination per excellent points above. Thanks everyone.
Boleyn (
talk) 09:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Cut Bolyn some slack! They are working their butt off processing these articles.
Llajwa (
talk) 17:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.